An Analysis of “English for Nusantara” Textbook Through Multimodal Approach

Authors

  • Rahma Wati Arani UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau
  • Kurnia Budiyanti UIN Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Keywords:

English Textbook, Visual Meaning, English for Nusantara

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze how visual images and verbal texts combine to expose visual meaning in the “English for Nusantara” textbook for Grade 7. The researcher used a qualitative research design with content analysis, focusing on Chapters 1 through 5. This study employed Kress and van Leeuwen’s multimodal discourse theory—representational, interactive, and compositional modes. Findings reveal that the combination of images and texts in the textbook effectively scaffolds student comprehension. Images help clarify the task, enhance engagement, and support language acquisition, making the textbook a valuable resource for EFL students. This study highlights the textbook’s alignment with the Merdeka Curriculum and its use of multimodal resources to promote literacy

References

Angguni, L., Suharmoko, & Dabamona, M. (2026). A study on the appropriateness of vocabulary in the Grade IX English textbook: Perspectives of teachers and students. International Journal of English Education and Linguistics (IJoEEL), 8(1), 135–148. https://doi.org/10.33650/ijoeel.v8i1.15220

Baddeley, A. D., & Longman, D. J. A. (1978). The influence of length and frequency of training session on the rate of learning to type. Ergonomics, 21(8), 627–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931764

Chen, Y. (2010). The semiotic construal of attitudinal curriculum goals: Evidence from EFL textbooks in China. Linguistics and Education, 21(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.12.001

Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary years. UNSW Press.

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approach. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Heinemann.

Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Academic Press.

Giaschi, P. (2000). Gender positioning in education: A critical image analysis of ESL texts. TESL Canada Journal, 18(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v18i1.902

Gibbons, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching English language learners in the mainstream classroom (2nd ed.). Greenwood Publishing Group.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic. Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). Edward Arnold.

Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357203002001751

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Reading and writing with images: A review of four texts. In Reading images: The grammar of visual design.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold.

Kress, G. (2009). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (1992). Structures of visual representation. Semiotica, 89(4), 497–513. https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.1992.89.1-2.497

Maffia, A. M. C., Dias, L. S. M., Brauna, R. C. A., & Cruz, R. (2003, August). Analysis of teachers’ performance in the selection program of science textbook. Paper presented at the Meeting of the European Science Education Research Association.

Marefat, F., & Marzban, S. (2014). Multimodal analysis of gender representation in ELT textbooks: Reader's perceptions. In International Conference on Current Trends in ELT. Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2009). Dealing with validity, reliability, and ethics. In Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (pp. 209–235). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Moya, J., & Jesús, M. (2008). Compositional, interpersonal and representational meanings in a children’s narrative: A multimodal discourse analysis. University of Castilla-La Mancha, Spain.

Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia‐Pacific Region. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 589–613. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588214

Salbego, N., Hebele, V., & Silva, M. (2015). A visual analysis of English textbooks: Multimodal scaffolded learning. Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

Sugiono. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sweet, M. (2009). Writing learning objectives. University of Texas at Austin. http://www.utexas.edu/academic/diia/assessment/iar/students/plan/objectives/bloom-emphasize.php

Tarigan, H. G., & Tarigan, D. (1986). Telaah buku teks bahasa Indonesia. Angkasa.

Tahririan, M., & Sadri, E. (2013). Analysis of images in Iranian high school EFL course books. Sheikhbahaee University.

Thibault, P. J. (1991). Social semiotics as praxis: Text, social meaning making and Nabokov’s Ada. University of Minnesota Press.

Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2023). Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Van Leeuwen, T., & Jewitt, C. (Eds.). (2001). The handbook of visual analysis. Sage.

Yasin, M., et al. (2012). A visual analysis of a Malaysian English school textbook: Gender matters. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-30 — Updated on 2026-05-31

Versions

How to Cite

Rahma Wati Arani, & Kurnia Budiyanti. (2026). An Analysis of “English for Nusantara” Textbook Through Multimodal Approach. Transcript: Review of English Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 24–33. Retrieved from https://www.iainsorong.ac.id.203-175-8-151.cpanel.site/e-jurnal/index.php/Transcript/article/view/1889 (Original work published September 30, 2026)

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): May

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Transcript: Review of English Teaching and Learning

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

As a journal writer, you have the right to various uses of your article, including use by the institution or company where you work. This copyright can be used without special permission.

Publishing authors in TRANSCRIPT: Review of Teaching and Learning English have broad rights to use their work for teaching and scientific purposes without the need to seek permission, including use for classroom teaching by Author or Author institutions and presentations at meetings or conferences and distributing copies to participants; used for internal training by the author's company; distribution to colleagues for their research use; used in compilations of the authors' subsequent works; included in a thesis or dissertation; reuse of sections or excerpts from articles in other works (with full acknowledgement of the final article); preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of the final article); Voluntary posting on open websites operated by authors or authors' bodies for scientific purposes (follow CC by 4.0 license ).

Authors and readers can copy and redistribute the material in any media or format, as well as remix, modify and build the material for any purpose, even commercially, but they must provide appropriate credit (cite the article or content), provide a link to the license, and indicate if anything changes. If you mix, modify, or build upon the materials, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the originals.